Search Results for "Land encroachment"

849 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 849 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging 1961 Land Acquisition as Barred by Delay and Laches. Petitioner's claim for restoration of land acquired over six decades ago fails due to unexplained delay and lack of locus standi.

The petitioner, Amratlal Ishwarlal Patel, aged about 84 years and a retired Central Government pensioner, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition Seeking Disposal of Appeal Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act as Encroachment Already Removed. No further adjudication required as the subject matter of the appeal has become infructuous.

The petitioner, Indirani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the first responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Seeking Stay of Eviction Due to Pending Statutory Appeal Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Invocation of Alternative Remedy Under Section 10 of the Act Bars Parallel Writ Proceedings Under Article 226.

The petitioner, Rasu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Stay of Eviction Notice Due to Availability of Statutory Appeal. Petitioner Had Already Invoked Appellate Remedy Under Section 10 of Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, Rendering Writ Petition Impermissible.

The petitioner, V. Jeyaram, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.8-11 in Property Suit — Consent Terms Accepted Despite Objections from Other Defendants. Partial Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Does Not Affect Rights of Non-Settling Defendants Who May Continue to Contest the Suit.

The suit was filed by 35 plaintiffs seeking a declaration that they are purchasers of certain property. The matter was listed for settlement as the pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeals of Occupants Challenging Eviction from Comunidade Land — Appellants Failed to Prove Title or Authorisation, Eviction Upheld Under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC and Section 38 Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves five first appeals filed by Ayub Khan, Khurshida Ahmad, Salim Sandhi, Mehmood A. Ansari, and Dadapir Lohar against the State of Goa,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Perversity. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Remanded for Fresh Adjudication on Merits.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents herei...