Search Results for "Fundamental rights"

296 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 296 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana. Rule 24(i-eeee) of Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914 as State Government Cannot Delegate Power to Determine Number of Licenses for Entire State.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 (as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana — Rule 24(i-eeee) Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914. State Government's Exclusive Power Under Section 58(2)(e) to Regulate Licenses in Local Areas Cannot Be Delegated to Financial Commissioner.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970, as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Air Force Officers' Premature Separation Cases. Officers Cannot Withdraw PSS Application After Availing Pre-Release Course Under Human Resource Policy.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals concerning four officers of the Indian Air Force who applied for Premature Separation from Service (PSS) un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Former Employee's Writ Petition Seeking CBI Investigation Against Company — No Fundamental Right Violation. Contractual Disputes Cannot Be Agitated Under Article 32; Suppression of Pending Civil Suits Leads to Dismissal.

The petitioner, a former CEO of Respondent No.12 Company, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus direct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against High Court Direction to Consider Havildars for Promotion to Naib Subedar Under Pre-2011 Rules. Creation of Intermediate Warrant Officer Post Does Not Violate Vested Rights; Promotion Must Be Considered Under Rules in Force at Time of Consideration.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the High Court of Manipur. The respondents, Havildars in Ass...