Search Results for "wilful disobedience"

220 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 220 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Order Striking Off Defence in Easement Suit — Inquiry Required Before Penalty Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC. The court held that striking off defence is a harsh order and can only be passed after an inquiry establishing wilful disobedience of an injunction order.

The appellants, original defendants in a suit for easementary rights, challenged an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Quepem dated 16.9.2020,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Food Corporation of India for Non-Compliance of Regularisation Orders — No Willful Disobedience Found as Corporation Took Steps Towards Compliance

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of contempt petitions filed by workmen unions against the Food Corporation of India (FCI) for alleged non-complian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Contempt Order Against TWAD Board in Land Compensation Case — No Willful Disobedience Found. Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Used to Enhance Compensation Beyond Original Writ Directions.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board (TWAD Board) against the judgment of the Madras High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Dismissal of Suit for Non-Compliance with Discovery Orders. Order XI Rule 21 CPC Dismissal Set Aside as Trial Court Failed to Record Satisfaction of Willful Disobedience.

The petitioner, United Church of Northern India Trust Association, filed a suit for ejectment against the respondents who were in occupation of its pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition and Striking Out of Defence Under Order XXXIX Rule 11 CPC. Non-Compliance with Access Orders Disputed; Video Evidence and Counsellor Report Considered.

The appellant wife filed Family Court Appeal No.20 of 2013 challenging the order dated 8th November 2012 passed by the Family Court at Mumbai. By that...