Search Results for "void award"

778 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 778 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Property by Co-operative Bank Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — Auction Sale Confirmed Despite Alleged Irregularities as Petitioner Failed to Prove Fraud or Collusion.

The petitioner, M/s. Priyesh Land Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the auction sale of its property by the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Execution of Arbitration Award as Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale. Arbitration Award Only Fixed Land Price; Executing Court Could Not Direct Sale Deed Execution Beyond Award's Scope.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Firm Rajasthan Udyog and its partners against Hindustan Engineering & Industries Ltd. The dispute origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Restores Arbitral Award for Compensation for Unproductive Use of Machinery. Court Holds That High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting Its Own View.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had set aside an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Holds That Objections to Enforceability Must Be Raised Under Section 48 and That Pendency of Civil Suit Does Not Bar Execution.

The case involves two special leave petitions filed by LMJ International Ltd. and Sri Munisuvrata Agri International Ltd. against Sleepwell Industries...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Holds That Objections to Enforceability Must Be Raised Under Section 48 and That Pendency of Civil Suit Does Not Bar Execution

The Supreme Court dismissed two special leave petitions filed by LMJ International Ltd. and Sri Munisuvrata Agri International Ltd. against the judgme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Securities Arbitration Case — Interest Award Not an Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is not an appeal; mere disagreement with the judgment is not a ground for review.

The review petition was filed by Kotak Securities Ltd. seeking review of the judgment dated 22.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in RFA No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds award rejecting claim for specific performance of agreement to sell immovable property, finding no grounds under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rajesh V. Choudhary, filed Arbitration Petition No.734 of 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Arbitration Suit for Non-Compliance of Court Order. Petitioner Failed to Pay Costs as Directed, Leading to Dismissal Under Order IX Rule 8 CPC.

The petitioner, M/s Crompton Greaves Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 2...