Search Results for "unconscionable contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "unconscionable contract"

96 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Gas Supply Contract Dispute Over Transportation Charges. The court upheld the High Court's quashing of contractual clauses imposing loss of transportation charges, finding the writ petition maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India despite contractual arbitration clauses, and addressed limitation issues for refund claims.

8 Apr 2025

The dispute arose between M/s Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL) and Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. (IPCL) regarding a gas supply contract ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Writ Petition Against Insurance Ombudsman Award in Life Insurance Claim. Non-Disclosure of Pre-Existing Ailments Not Proven to be Material Under Section 45 of Insurance Act, 1938.

18 Aug 2022

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged an award dated 31 December 2020 passed by the Insurance Ombudsman, Goa/Mumbai Met...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Demand for Transfer Fees and Unilateral Imposition of Fresh Lease Terms. Lease Renewal Must Be on Existing Terms Unless Mutually Agreed, and Transfer of Leasehold Interest Does Not Attract Transfer Fees Without Specific Statutory Provision.

5 Aug 2022

The petitioners, ten individuals and a company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actions of the Na...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

21 Oct 2019

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows ICICI Bank's Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitral Award on Claims for Loss of Profit and Interest on Mobilization Advance. The court held that the arbitrator cannot award interest on an interest-free mobilization advance and cannot award loss of profit without evidence of actual loss.

30 Mar 2016

The petitioner, ICICI Bank Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine Transaction. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to establish the execution and validity of the agreement to sell, and the suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

10 Sep 2015

The appellant, Mr. Arjun M. Menda, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Trust and Accounts Against Bank in Palm Oil Import Dispute. Consent Decree in Prior Suit Bars Plaintiff from Claiming Sale Proceeds as Trust Property.

12 Mar 2015

The plaintiffs, Bajranglal Anilkumar Jaju and Hitesh Anilkumar Jaju, filed Suit No. 824 of 1980 against The Vyasya Bank Ltd. seeking a declaration tha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Agreement of Sale Found Unconscionable and Not Proved. Court holds that readiness and willingness is sine qua non for decree of specific performance and that appellate court cannot rely on unproduced documents without following Order 41 Rule 27 CPC.

27 Jan 2011

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 8-8-1973 filed by the original plaintiff (respondent No.1) against ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)