Search Results for "unauthorized debit"

41 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 41 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Unconditional Stay of Arbitral Award Due to Stamp Duty Deficiency. Arbitration Agreement in Unstamped Member Client Agreement Held Void Ab Initio Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioner, M/s. Anand Rathi Share & Stock Brokers Ltd., challenged an order passed by the District Judge-1, Amravati, which granted unconditional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1543 OF 2014

The matter arose from a stock trading dispute between Keynote Capitals Ltd. (a trading member of the National Stock Exchange) and Eco Recycling Ltd. (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Gratuity for Bank Employee Found Guilty of Financial Irregularities. Disciplinary Inquiry Sufficient for Forfeiture Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Acts Amount to Wilful Omission and Moral Turpitude.

The petitioner, Nanubhai Nichhabhai Desai, worked as a clerk with UCO Bank for over 31 years. His services were terminated by compulsory retirement wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Pension by Syndicate Bank — Violation of Natural Justice and Pension Regulations. Reduction of two-third pension without show cause notice set aside; bank directed to restore full pension and pay arrears.

The petitioner, B. Narayana Rao, was appointed as a Clerk in Syndicate Bank on 22.5.1972 and rose to the position of Senior Manager in Grade Scale-V b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Established. Court upholds award holding petitioner liable for unauthorized trades and failure to prove respondent's instructions.

The petitioner, Sytematix Shares & Stocks (India) Ltd., a stockbroker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...