Search Results for "typographical error"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "typographical error"

173 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Judicial Service Seniority Dispute. Court upheld original judgment finding no error apparent on record, determining that promotions in 2010 and direct recruitments in 2013 were separate selection processes not requiring cyclic order implementation under Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules.

30 Nov 2021

The Supreme Court was hearing Review Petitions filed by judicial officers challenging a previous judgment regarding seniority determinations in the Ra...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway's Challenge to CAT Order in Recruitment Dispute — Typographical Error in Date of Birth Does Not Disqualify Candidate. The court held that a bona fide typographical error in the application form should not be a ground to reject candidature when the candidate is otherwise eligible.

19 Apr 2006

The respondent, Nandkishore Khatib Jangad, applied for the post of Khalasi with the Western Railway. In his application form, he inadvertently mention...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Corrects Typographical Error in Judgment - Error in Year of Case Number. The Court directed correction of a typographical error in its judgment dated 20th May, 2025, where the year of the case number was incorrectly mentioned as '2000' instead of '2020'.

23 May 2025

The Supreme Court, in a brief order dated 23rd May, 2025, addressed a typographical error in its earlier judgment and order dated 20th May, 2025, pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Royal Traders' Plea for Waiver in SARFAESI Act Appeal. The court reinforces the necessity of pre-deposit compliance under Section 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act and dismisses petitions seeking waiver.

19 Dec 2024

The judgment clarifies the scope of Section 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, particularly the conditions for pre-deposit waivers by borrowers appealin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows NHAI's Appeal in Arbitration Delay Condonation Case — Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended Beyond 120 Days. The Court held that the proviso to Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is a complete code and the maximum period for filing a Section 34 application is 120 days from the date of receipt of the award or order, and no court has the power to condone delay beyond that period.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which ha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SARFAESI Auction Case, Reinstating DRT Order and Sale. High Court's Writ Jurisdiction Improper When Statutory Remedy Available; Auction Deposit Complied with Rules and Property Not Exempt as Agricultural Land Under Section 31(i) SARFAESI Act.

5 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from securitisation proceedings initiated by Indian Bank against M/s. Raus Constructions Private Ltd. after loan default. The bank c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Without Considering Plaint as a Whole and Without Trial on Issues of Title and Possession.

16 Nov 2011

The petitioners (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Salcete, claiming that they we...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher's Petition in Termination Dispute — Continuous Temporary Appointments Do Not Confer Permanent Status. Successive temporary appointments on consolidated salary from 1982 to 1993 held not to create a right to permanency under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

28 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Shrikrushna s/o Nilkanth Joshi, was an Assistant Teacher at Geeta Prashala, Kopargaon, run by the Kopargaon Education Society. He was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher's Petition Challenging Termination - Continuous Temporary Appointments on Consolidated Salary Do Not Confer Permanent Status Under MEPS Act, 1977.

28 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Shrikrushna Nilkanth Joshi, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher by Kopargaon Education Society on 18/06/1982 for one academic year o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Police Recruitment Case — Upholds Candidature of Appellant Found Eligible Despite Typographical Error in Application. Error in Date of Birth Column Did Not Render Candidate Disqualified Where Actual Age Was Within Limits and No Fraud Was Alleged.

25 Aug 2023

The appellant, Aish Mohammad, applied for the post of Constable in the Haryana Police. In the application form, he inadvertently entered his date of b...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)