Search Results for "trademark dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "trademark dispute"

154 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 154 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Scope of Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act in International Commercial Disputes. Multiple Issues Framed on Reference to Arbitration in Multi-Party Joint Venture Agreements.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute arose from a series of joint venture and ancillary agreements executed between Indian company Chloro Controls (I) P. Ltd. and foreign coll...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Commercial Suit and Interim Application in Asset Reconstruction Dispute — Upholds Validity of Assignment of Debt and Security Interest. Court holds that an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) is entitled to enforce security interest under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) after valid assignment of debt.

15 Apr 2026

The Applicant, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, an Asset Reconstruction Company registered with the RBI, filed a Commercial Suit (COMSS No. 124 of 2025) a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership.

6 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learn...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trademark Dispute Between GoBold and GoBoult — Interim Injunction Set Aside. The court held that the Commercial Court's order directing the defendant to use 'formerly BOULT' was not justified as the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored the defendant.

24 Nov 2025

The appellant, Exotic Mile Private Limited (defendant), challenged an interim order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the XI Additional District and Sessions...

High Court

Madras High Court Adjudicates Cross-Petitions for Rectification of Trade Mark Register Under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Dispute Involves Competing Claims for Removal of Respective Registered Marks in Class 9.

20 Feb 2025

...

High Court

Protecting Consumer Clarity in Pharmaceutical Markets

13 Jun 2024

The case involves a dispute over trademark infringement between the plaintiff's "ZITA-MET" and the defendant's "XIGAMET" in the pharmaceutical sector....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Dispute Over Perfume Names 'Legend' and 'Flirt'. Court finds no deceptive similarity as marks are common dictionary words used with house marks and no evidence of passing off.

8 Aug 2019

The appellant, MESO Private Limited, manufactures and sells cosmetic products including perfumes under the trademarks 'Legend' and 'Flirt'. The respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Leave Granted Under Clause XII of Letters Patent in Trademark Infringement Suit — Plaintiff's Business Activities in Mumbai Confer Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case that part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this court, and the defendants failed to discharge the burden of proving that the leave was improperly granted.

12 Jul 2017

The plaintiff, M/s Black Ticket Films, a registered partnership firm based in New Delhi, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court against two defendants ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

19 Sep 2016

The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)