Search Results for "time-barred"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "time-barred"

73 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Appointment Despite Limitation Bar — Scope of Section 11(6A) Confined to Existence of Arbitration Agreement. The 2015 Amendment Act restricts court's role to checking arbitration agreement existence, leaving limitation and other issues to arbitrator under Section 16.

27 Nov 2019

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 21.12.2010 between M/s. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited (Petitioner-Contractor) and Northern Co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Order VIII Rule 6A CPC Mandatory for Filing Counterclaim Before Written Statement. Counterclaim Filed After Written Statement Is Not Permissible as Provision Imposes Embargo on Belated Filing.

19 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India, in a three-judge bench, addressed a reference regarding the interpretation of Order VIII Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Proc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Reference on Interpretation of Section 9A CPC (Maharashtra Amendment) — Jurisdiction Includes Limitation. The court examines whether the expression 'jurisdiction of the Court to entertain such suit' under Section 9A includes the issue of limitation, doubting the correctness of Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society v. Praveen D. Desai.

4 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered a reference made by a Division Bench doubting the correctness of the decision in Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society Li...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

18 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Central Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the buyer's refund claim is time-barred as it was filed beyond six months from the date of purchase, and the manufacturer's protest does not extend the limitation for the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim in Central Excise Duty Case — Limitation Period Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the period of limitation of six months under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to a buyer's refund claim even if the manufacturer paid duty under protest, as the rights of manufacturer and buyer are distinct.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the appellant/buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise dut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree Under Maharashtra Rent Act, 1999 — Notice Under Section 15 Held Valid Despite Inclusion of Time-Barred Rent Claim, but Eviction on Bonafide Need Set Aside as Landlord Gave Up That Ground.

15 Oct 2010

The petitioner, a tenant, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 27/4/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Claimants in Motor Accident Claims for Deaths in Autorikshaw Collision with Truck — Negligence of Truck Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Proven. Compensation Enhanced with Multiplier 17, Future Prospects, and 7.5% Interest.

19 Apr 2010

The appeals arise from a motor accident claim where three deceased persons (Madhukar Dabhalkar, Kailash Bathe, and Kadusing Rajput) died in a collisio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order on Permanency and Back Wages in Newspaper Industry Dispute. Industrial Court's finding that previous litigation had determined entitlement to permanency and back wages was upheld, but the High Court held that the Industrial Court had no jurisdiction to grant permanency under the MRTU Act.

12 Mar 2010

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees (Sanjay Shalikram Ingle and others) against M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Private Ltd., chal...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)