Search Results for "third-party rights"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Contempt Case for Violation of Asset Restraint Orders. The court found that the review petitioner failed to show any error apparent on record justifying interference, as the omitted reply did not contradict the factual basis of the contempt findings.

The Supreme Court dismissed review petitions filed by Dr. Vijay Mallya against the judgment dated 09.05.2017, which had found him guilty of contempt o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against WPL in Super Bazar Revival Case — No Willful Disobedience of Orders Found. Revival Scheme Implemented Under Court Supervision; Payments Made as Directed.

The judgment pertains to contempt petitions filed against M/s Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (WPL) alleging willful disobedience of court orders in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Housing Board Against Quashing of Layout Plan Modification. Statutory Modification of Layout Plan Not Subject to Promissory Estoppel When Procedure Followed Under Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

The case involves an appeal by the Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board against a High Court judgment that quashed the modifica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Directing Return of Passport in Contempt Proceedings for Breach of Undertaking. The Court restored the Single Judge's order impounding the passport of a contemnor who repeatedly breached undertakings given to the court in a property dispute.

The appellant, Shyam Sahni, filed a civil suit in 2008 seeking declaration, possession, and partition of a property in Friends Colony, New Delhi, orig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Refund Order in Consumer Case Against Builder for Delayed Possession. Builder's Failure to Deliver Villa by Agreed Date Constitutes Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The case involves an appeal by Marvel Omega Builders Pvt. Ltd. and another against the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission...