Search Results for "tainted hands"

437 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 437 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by original accused No.1, Rafiq Beg Mirza, challenging his conviction by the learned Special Judge, Jalgaon, in Special C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bill Collector in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bhaskar Khashaba Yewle, was a Bill Collector in the office of Tahasildar Encroachment. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Contends Non-Proof of Bribe Demand and Admission of Loan Repayment by Complainant.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 29.03.2005 in Special Case No.26/2003 passed by the Special Judge at Aurangabad, convicting the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits High Court Chobdar in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Reversed Due to Unreliable Complainant Evidence and Lack of Proper Verification of Bribe Demand.

The appeal arose from a conviction of Shridhar Chavan, a Chobdar (attendant) in the High Court of Bombay, under sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mahalingappa, a retired Junior Engineer of KPTCL, was convicted by the Special Judge and Principal Sessions Judge, Bidar, in Special Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramesh Sonawane, was an Assistant Sub-Inspector at a police chowki in Government Medical College Hospital, Aurangabad. He was convicted...