Search Results for "sudden jerk"

73 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Injured Passenger Held to be Bona Fide Traveller. Fall from Train Due to Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appellant, Satish Padole, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal for injuries sustained on 21 September 2018 at Pathrad Railway Station....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989. Fall from Train Due to Jerk and Rush Constitutes Untoward Incident; Tribunal's Rejection Based on Nature of Injuries Set Aside.

The appeal was filed by the original claimants, Nirmala wd/o Nagorao Gadling and Sachin s/o Nagorao Gadling, challenging the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Amputation of Both Legs Due to Fall from Train. Held that the claimant was a bona fide passenger and the incident was an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling him to compensation.

The appellant, Nagesh Gulabrao Kale, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, for injuries sustained in an untoward ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Accidental Fall from Train Due to Jerk. Deemed Bona Fide Passenger Entitled to ₹8,00,000 Compensation Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The present appeal was filed by the Union of India under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenging the award dated 20.08.2025 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway's Appeal Against Compensation for Accidental Fall from Train. Deceased was a bona fide passenger who fell due to sudden jerk and jolt, not a trespasser, under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal was filed by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager, South Western Railway, Hubli, against the order dated 28.12.2010 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Train Accident Victim Under Railways Act, 1989 — Amputation of Leg Due to Fall from Train Held as 'Accidental Falling' from Train Carrying Passengers.

The appellant, Ramesh Istari @ Istaru Kore, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, alleging that on 24.2.2016, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Death of Passenger Due to Fall from Train Held Untoward Incident. Mother of Deceased Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 as Negligence Not a Defence.

The appeal was filed by the mother of the deceased, Dinesh, challenging the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, which rejected her claim ...