Search Results for "statutory recruitment rules"

815 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 815 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Peon's Claim for Promotion to Tracer Post, Upholds Direct Recruitment Requirement. Post of Tracer Must Be Filled by Direct Recruitment Under Rule 5(1)(e) of Orissa Subordinate Architectural Service Rules, 1979, Not by Promotion from Peon Cadre.

The petitioner, Jyostnamayee Mishra, was appointed as a peon in the Works Department of the State of Odisha in 1978. She sought promotion to the post ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Rajasthan High Court's Decision to Fix Minimum Cut-Off Marks After Examination in Translator Recruitment. Fixing 75% Cut-Off After Examination Held Impermissible as It Alters Selection Procedure Mid-Process Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The case arose from a recruitment process initiated by the Rajasthan High Court in 2009 for 13 posts of Translators. The applicable rules, as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Amended Recruitment Rules Equating Posts of Principal and Joint Chief Inspector of Factories as Infructuous Due to Retirement of Employee. Transfer Order Set Aside as Mala Fide; Period Between Transfer and Superannuation Treated as Dies Non.

The case involves appeals by the Union of India against a common judgment of the Madras High Court confirming orders of the Central Administrative Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010059832012_1

The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010366622012_1

...