Search Results for "signature comparison"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "signature comparison"

331 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 331 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Vacation of Interim Injunction in 'RACIRAFT' vs 'ESIRAFT' Trademark Case. The Court Examines Whether the Impugned Mark 'ESIRAFT' is Deceptively Similar to the Registered Mark 'RACIRAFT' for Pharmaceutical Products, Applying the Anti-Dissection Rule and Principles of Phonetic and Visual Similarity.

8 Apr 2026

The case involved a commercial appeal filed by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. against an order of the Single Judge vacating an ad-interim injuncti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Fraud Case, Reversing Dismissal of Suit for Declaration and Injunction. The court found that visible discrepancies in sale deeds and police complaint established fraud, making handwriting expert opinion not mandatory under evidence law.

18 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a suit filed by the plaintiff seeking declaration that four sale deeds executed in 2018 were null and void and not binding on h...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order for Specimen Signature in Cheating Case — Section 311A Cr.P.C. Application After Charge Sheet Not Maintainable. Court holds that application under Section 311A Cr.P.C. for specimen handwriting can only be made during investigation, not after filing of charge sheet.

16 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, was an accused in Crime No.9/2020 registered at Yapaladinni Police Station for offences under Sections 420, 468, 470 and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Discusses First Appeal in Specific Performance Dispute, Highlights Need for Factual Adjudication Over Excessive Citations. The court underscores that judgments must contain analysis of pleadings and evidence rather than merely citing precedents, as required under Section 96 CPC and principles from Narada Smriti.

16 Mar 2020

The High Court of Karnataka was seized of a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from the dismissal of ...

High Court

Regular First Appeal Against Common Judgment Decreeping Suit for Perpetual Injunction and Dismissing Suit for Declaration That Sale Deeds Are Not Binding on Co-Parceners. Dispute Centered on Whether Property Was Joint Family Asset or Self-Acquired and Validity of Sale Deeds Executed by Karta or Power of Attorney Holder.

27 Jan 2020

The appeals arose from two suits tried together. One suit (O.S.No.1611/1994) was filed by the plaintiffs, claiming to be co-parceners of an undivided ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to Set Aside Rejection of Application for Handwriting Expert Opinion in N.I. Act Case. Accused's Right to Fair Trial Includes Opportunity to Dispute Signature on Loan Documents Through Expert Evidence Under Sections 45 and 73 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

17 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Annappa Maruti Magadum, was a member of the respondent, Karnataka Multipurpose Souhard Sahakari Ltd., Chikkodi. He availed a MTL loan ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Trial Court's Refusal to Send Documents for Handwriting Expert Opinion in Will Dispute. Court Holds That Section 73 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Does Not Empower a Court to Compel a Witness to Give Sample Signatures for Comparison.

15 Apr 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the petitioners (defendants in a suit) challenging an order of the Trial Court dismissing their applicat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will Allegedly Executed by Father, Finding Suspicious Circumstances and Lack of Proof of Execution and Attestation. Will dated 21st November 1992 propounded by son fails as attesting witness not examined and execution not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

8 Jul 2016

The plaintiff, Shirish Popatlal Shah, filed a petition for Letters of Administration with Will Annexed in respect of a Will dated 21st November 1992 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will After Rejecting Allegations of Unsound Mind, Undue Influence, and Unnatural Disposition. Execution Proved by Attesting Witnesses Despite Minor Inconsistencies; Burden of Proving Invalidity Not Discharged by Caveator Under Indian Succession Act, 1925.

23 Mar 2016

The case involved a testamentary suit filed by the executors of the will of Rajendra Singh Kushwaha, who died in Mumbai on 18th December 2009. The pla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Section 138 NI Act Case, Holding Unsigned Complaint is Curable Irregularity. Amendment to Sign Complaint Relates Back to Date of Filing, Saving Limitation.

18 Mar 2010

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from complaints filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by M/s. Reliance Indus...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)