Search Results for "set-off"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Unregistered Partnership Firm. Court Holds That Section 69(3) of Partnership Act, 1932 Does Not Bar Arbitration Reference for Claims Arising from Partnership Disputes.

The applicant, Ezra Victor Aboody, and the respondent, H. Dhanrajgir Estate Pvt. Ltd., entered into a partnership deed on 14 February 2003 for coachin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sales Tax Assessment Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners Failed to Show Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Remedy of Reference Under Section 61(1) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Tata Sons Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Encashment of Bank Guarantees in Subcontractor Dispute. Fraud and Irretrievable Injustice Established as Grounds for Injunction Against Bank Guarantee Invocation Under Contract Law.

The Plaintiff, ITD Cementation India Ltd., filed a suit seeking a restraint order against Defendant No.1, Reliance Infrastructure Limited, from demand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Employer in Industrial Dispute — Tribunal Award Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. The Court held that the Industrial Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain the reference as the dispute was not an industrial dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.4009/1997, on 19th of September, 2007. The pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cenvat Credit Appeals in Central Excise Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Suppression of Facts. Credit Denial Unsustainable When Simultaneously Available to Other Factories Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

The case involves four appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. and Sanjay P. Agarw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistencies in Evidence. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 506 Part-I IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nagesh s/o Samayya Made, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli in Special (POCSO) Case No.21/2016 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...