Search Results for "service of summons"

50 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Striking Off Written Statements in Commercial Suit — Time Limit of 120 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by defendants in a commercial suit instituted by Tata Steel Ltd. (respondent) for recovery of amount...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Due to Invalid Service of Summons. Service by affixture without prior attempt at personal service held invalid under Order V Rule 17 CPC, and ex-parte decree set aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The appellant, M/s Arjun Travels, a sole proprietorship concern, was the owner of a vehicle involved in a motor accident. The respondents, being the l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Custody Order Due to Lack of Proper Service and Remands Matter for Fresh Hearing. Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 — Sections 6, 7 — Custody of minor child — Ex parte order passed without ensuring effective service on respondent mother.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 28.5.2013 passed by the Judge, Family Court No. 7, Bandra, Mumbai, in Petition No. D-75 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Condonation of Delay Application in Ex-Parte Decree Setting Aside Case. Administrator's Failure to Inform Appellant Constitutes Sufficient Cause for Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Communidade of Malcornem, filed an Appeal from Order No. 19 of 2014 in the High Court of Bombay at Goa, challenging an order passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Dismiss Suit Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC. Order IX Rule 5 CPC does not apply when summons were never issued to defendants, and the provision is directory, allowing court discretion to extend time for service.

The petitioner, Sanjay Madanchand Kashyap, who was defendant no.1 in Special Civil Suit No.769 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Due to Lack of Proper Service of Summons and Non-Prosecution. Decree Set Aside as Defendant Was Not Given Opportunity to Defend.

The appeal was filed against the judgment and order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim, decreeing the suit for recovery of Rs. 60,000 with ...