Search Results for "section 364A IPC"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dr. Rajkumar Kidnapping Case — Evidence Lacks Credibility and Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Charges Under IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Coimbatore, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(1)(b) CrPC a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Process Against Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Inordinate Delay. Complaint Filed After Six Years Without Explanation Fails to Make Out Offences Under Sections 341, 342, 364A, 120(B) r/w 34 IPC.

The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi considered a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC filed by four petitioners seeking to quash the order o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Victim's Appeal for Enhancement of Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Victim Cannot Appeal Under Section 372 CrPC for Inadequate Sentence; Only State Government Can Seek Enhancement Under Section 377 CrPC.

The appellant, Parvinder Kansal, was the father of a deceased boy and the complainant in FIR No.742 of 2007 registered for offences under Section 364A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence for Section 364A IPC. Court finds no demand for ransom or threat to kill, essential for Section 364A IPC, and grants bail under Section 439 CrPC.

The petitioner, Manjunatha @ Manju, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in Crime N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom and Murder in Section 364A IPC Case — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Victim's Body. Appellants' Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Proved Chain of Circumstances Leading to Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping for ransom and subsequent murder of a 10-year-old boy, the son of a police constable. The appellants, Shashikant T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 364A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand for ransom and threat beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping of a minor boy, Sumit, son of Shantaram Kumbhar (PW1), on 18th November 2002. The prosecution alleged that the app...