Search Results for "section 36(4)"

544 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence of Gang Leader in MCOCA Kidnapping and Murder Case. Conviction under MCOCA and IPC for kidnapping for ransom and murder upheld, but co-accused's death sentence commuted to life imprisonment due to lesser role.

The judgment arises from a confirmation case and appeals against the conviction and death sentence of five accused persons under the Maharashtra Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that Order 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence or to allow a party to adduce additional evidence after closure of evidence.

The petitioners, who are defendants in a partition suit, filed a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Goa Children's Act, 2003 as Premature. Petitioner Convicted for Kidnapping and Murder of Minor Cannot Challenge State Legislation When Appeal Against Conviction is Pending.

The petitioner, Rohan Pradeep Dhungat, was convicted by the Goa Children's Court in Special Case No.28/2006 for offences including kidnapping for rans...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Articles Confirm Guilt Under Sections 302, 364, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Channappa @ Channu @ Channya Gangannawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge at Margao for the murder of Renuka, the wife o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. The court held that the suit for partition was maintainable and that the plaintiffs had established their share in the joint family property.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondents (defendants) seeking partition and separate possession...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging IPAB Order Refusing Additional Evidence in Trademark Opposition. Court holds that the IPAB's refusal to allow additional documents was not perverse or arbitrary, and the petitioners failed to show sufficient cause for not producing them earlier.

The petitioners, M/s. Agar Distributors (India) and Shri Siraj Amirali Soorani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16 July 2010 passed b...