Search Results for "section 34"

603 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 603 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 7.39 Crore with Interest. Limitation plea rejected as claim was within time; quantification not perverse.

The judgment concerns a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases. Court upholds enhanced compensation based on market value and potential use under National Highways Act, 1956.

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed four arbitration appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging MSME Facilitation Council Reference and Award — Held That Section 18 of MSMED Act, 2006 Does Not Require Prior Agreement for Reference and That Limitation Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to Setting Aside of Award.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Morarjee Textiles Ltd., its Head of Finance, and its Executive Director and Chairperson, challengi...