Search Results for "section 304-A"

172 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR and Charge Sheet in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case. Death of Security Guard During Altercation Over Parking Dispute Does Not Attract Section 304 IPC as No Intent or Knowledge of Likely Death Established.

The petitioners, residents and office bearers of Prestige Lake Side Habitat Home Owners Association, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Discharges Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge or Intent. Court holds that mere involvement in a road accident without evidence of rash or negligent driving does not attract Section 304 Part II IPC.

The revision petitioner, Kolla Bhovi, was the driver of a lorry involved in a road accident on 20.01.2013, resulting in the death of a cyclist. The co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction but Reduces Sentence in Rash and Negligent Driving Case. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Maintained While Substantive Imprisonment Reduced to Period Already Served Based on Mitigating Circumstances Including Compensation Payment and Family Situation.

The Supreme Court considered a criminal appeal challenging conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Charge Sheet Alteration. The court found that the charge sheet under Sections 304A, 201 and 202 IPC did not support the initial murder charge under Section 302 IPC, warranting bail.

The petitioner, Ravi, accused No.1, filed a petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking regular bail in Crime No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Rash Driving Case: Sentences to Run Concurrently. The Court held that under Section 31 CrPC, it is mandatory to specify whether multiple sentences run concurrently or consecutively, and directed concurrent running of sentences under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.

The appellant, Gagan Kumar, was prosecuted and convicted by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Swimming Pool Drowning Case — Acquittal Upheld for Lack of Proof of Rash or Negligent Act. Section 304A IPC requires direct causal link between a positive act of rashness or negligence and death; mere omission or lack of supervision not sufficient.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 30.01.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Court No.8), Akola i...