Search Results for "section 20"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Hears First Appeal against Denial of Specific Performance in Sale Agreement. Trial Court Denied Specific Performance Due to Non-Deposit of Balance Consideration, Appeal Filed Under Section 96 CPC.

The dispute arose from a sale agreement dated 29.02.2016 between the appellant/plaintiff and respondent/defendant for purchase of the suit property fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition Challenging Reversal of Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act. Appellate court erred in setting aside maintenance without considering wife's entitlement under Section 20 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Madhura Milind Gadgil, married respondent No.1, Milind Neelkant Gadgil, on 26 May 1990. A daughter was born on 5 July 1991. In 1997, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prakash Harishchandra Mandalik, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Syed Imam and Durgadas Kaushalye, a Police Sub Inspector and Police Head Constable, respect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Arbitration Act Case – Delhi Court Has Jurisdiction Over Section 20 Application. Application Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 Not an 'Application' Within Section 31(4) Barring Subsequent Section 20 Application.

The case concerned a dispute arising from a construction contract between the Union of India and the respondent, Surjeet Singh Atwal. The agreement, e...