Search Results for "section 156(3) CrPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 156(3) CrPC"

70 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 156(3) CrPC — Dispute Civil in Nature. Agreement for Sale Not Registered, Power of Attorney Revoked, No Criminal Intent Made Out.

11 Nov 2025

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate, filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld as Complaint Did Not Disclose Prima Facie Case.

11 Nov 2025

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate, filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 aga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Magistrate's Refusal to Order Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC — Magistrate Has Discretion to Choose Between Section 156(3) and Chapter XV Procedures. The Court held that a Magistrate is not bound to order police investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC upon receiving a complaint and may instead proceed under Section 200 CrPC.

2 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Subhash Kanade, was the original complainant who filed a complaint before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 27th Court at Mulund, alleging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Magistrate's Order for Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC in Private Complaint — Magistrate Must Apply Judicial Mind Before Directing Investigation. Order directing investigation under Section 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 quashed as it was passed without application of judicial mind after recording verification of complainant.

7 Jan 2014

The petitioners, four individuals, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sessions Court's Order Setting Aside Magistrate's Direction for Police Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC. The High Court Held That a Magistrate Can Order Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Even After Recording Complainant's Evidence at Pre-Cognizance Stage, as Cognizance Has Not Yet Been Taken.

13 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Rajesh Chandmal Varma, filed an application before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalgaon, alleging commission of various cognizable o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Police Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC — Magistrate's Discretion to Proceed Under Section 200 CrPC Upheld. The court held that the Magistrate's decision to examine the complainant on oath instead of directing police investigation was proper and not illegal.

24 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Savitrabai Sureshchandra Khatod, filed a complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, alleging offences under Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Magistrate's Order in Cooperative Bank Directors' Case — Abuse of Process and Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Criminal proceedings under Sections 406, 468, 477A IPC read with Section 34 IPC quashed as the Magistrate ignored the High Court's earlier order restoring the complaint for consideration under Section 202 CrPC, and the directors being public servants required sanction for prosecution.

19 Aug 2013

The applicants, nine directors of a cooperative bank, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking qu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Complainant Company in Criminal Complaint — Magistrate's Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC Restored. Revisional Court Erred in Dismissing Complaint as Not Being a Complaint Under Section 2(d) CrPC When It Clearly Contained Allegations of Cognizable Offences.

7 Aug 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Royal Palms (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, filed a complaint through its authorized representat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection from Arrest in Criminal Complaint for Breach of Trust — Petitioner Alleged No Role in Son's Business. Court Held That Interim Protection from Arrest Is Necessary to Prevent Irreparable Harm While Petition for Quashing Is Pending.

14 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Jagannath Singh, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of an FIR registered against him under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Investigation — Section 156(3) CrPC Order Set Aside as Magistrate Failed to Apply Judicial Mind. The Court held that the Magistrate must apply judicial mind before ordering investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC and cannot act as a post office.

3 May 2006

The petitioner, Jitendra Chandrakant Mehta, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of proceedings arising out of...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)