Search Results for "section 139 NI Act"

32 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 32 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Srinidhi Finance & Investment Corporation, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Basavanthappa, for the offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act stands unless rebutted by accused; accused failed to rebut presumption of legally enforceable debt.

The appeal was filed by the complainant (appellant) against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Banhatti, in C.C....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, M/s. Ajmera Housing Corporation, a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Rebut Presumption. Accused's Failure to Enter Witness Box and Lead Evidence Results in Confirmation of Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Amol @ Jolly Shrichand Kungwani, challenging his conviction under Section 138 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that once the cheque and signature are admitted, the presumption of a legally enforceable debt arises, and the accused must rebut it with evidence.

The appellant, Vandana Pandey, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Abhilasha Pande, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Compromise Cheque Dishonour Leads to Conviction as Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Damodhar Murlidhar Bajaj, against the acquittal of the accused, Ratan Suryabhan Shinde, ...