Search Results for "section 11B"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition for Refund of IGST on Ocean Freight -- Sets Aside Appellate Order Directing Limitation Verification -- Reliance on Precedents for Mistake of Law Refunds

The petitioners imported fertilizers on CIF basis, paying IGST on ocean freight under reverse charge mechanism as per RCM Notification No.10/2017. Aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses SEBI's Appeal in Securities Market Violation Case Due to Absence of Question of Law. Tribunal's Factual Findings on Advertisements, Manipulation, and Natural Justice Upheld, with Jurisdiction Under Section 15Z of SEBI Act, 1992 Confined to Legal Issues.

The dispute arose from a statutory appeal under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, filed by SEBI against the Securit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Interest on Delayed Rebate Claims Under Central Excise Act. Interest Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 Held Payable from Expiry of Three Months from Date of Receipt of Rebate Claim, Not from Date of Final Adjudication.

The case involves a dispute between the Union of India (Petitioner) and Jindal Drugs Limited (Respondent) regarding the payment of interest on delayed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty Paid on Exported Goods Under Mistake of Law — Rule 13 Export Bond Not Used. Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law is Recoverable and Limitation Under Section 11B Central Excise Act Does Not Apply to Mistake of Law Claims.

The petitioners, Tata SSL Ltd. and its director, exported consignments of Cold Rolled Sheets and Coils to Nepal by road. The goods were cleared from t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Central Excise Duty Demand Case Due to Absence of Adjudication Order and Show Cause Notice. Demand and Collection of Duty Without Adjudication Order and Show Cause Notice Under Central Excise Act, 1944 Cannot Be Sustained.

The petitioners, National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd. and Mr. N.C. Majumdar, manufacture PVC compounds and PVC Master Batches. Prior to May 1979,...