Search Results for "right to cross-examine"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "right to cross-examine"

25 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by School Management Against Labour Court Order in Reinstatement Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice Found as Employee Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses. Principles of Natural Justice Require Full Opportunity to Defend, Including Cross-Examination, Before Adverse Order Can Be Passed Under Section 30 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

5 Dec 2023

The petitioners, President/Secretary of Uttar Bhartiya Education Society and Head Mistress of Acharya Narendra Dev Vidyamandir, challenged the order o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Petition Under Article 227 and Section 482 CrPC Against Rejection of Application Under Section 145(2) of Negotiable Instruments Act — Right to Cross-Examine Complainant's Witnesses Cannot Be Denied

23 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Kishor Biradmal Bhandari, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused's Cross-Examination in NI Act Case - Right Under Section 145(2) Not Conditional on Written Statement. The court held that the accused's right to cross-examine the complainant under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is absolute and not dependent on filing a written statement, setting aside the trial court's rejection order.

9 May 2023

The petitioner, Rakesh Singh, filed two criminal writ petitions challenging the order dated 07/10/2023 passed by the trial court in two complaints und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Order Closing Evidence in NI Act Case — Failure to Cross-Examine Complainant's Affidavit Does Not Automatically Close Defence Evidence. The court held that the accused's right to cross-examine the complainant's affidavit-in-evidence is fundamental to a fair trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the trial court's order closing evidence without granting such opportunity was premature and set aside.

9 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Shankar Lotlikar, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Cross-Examination Application in DRT Proceedings — Failure to File Evidence Affidavit Justifies Denial of Cross-Examination Under Rule 12(6) of RDDBFI (Procedure) Rules, 1993.

26 Nov 2014

The appellants, M/s Perfect Polybaags Private Ltd. and its directors, were defendants in Original Application No.239/2011 pending before the Debt Reco...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)