Search Results for "revised pay rules 2008"

380 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 380 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's 2011 Pay Scale Order, Settles Long-Standing Litigation. Court Affirms Doctrine of Merger, Ensures Fair Compensation for Retired Employees, and Provides Finality to Pay Discrepancy Dispute

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a protracted litigation involving the State of Uttar Pradesh and its employees regarding the implementation of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teachers' Petition for Pay Revision Benefits - Discrimination in Pay Scales Violates Article 14. Teachers in aided schools are entitled to same pay scales as government school teachers under Goa School Education Act, 1984.

The petitioners, six teachers employed in aided and government schools in Goa, filed a writ petition seeking the benefit of revision of pay scales on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in MACP Scheme Case Due to Erroneous Interpretation of Grade Pay Entitlement. Employees Entitled to Immediate Next Higher Grade Pay of Rs.5400 Under Clause 8.1 of MACP Scheme and CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, Not Based on Next Promotional Post.

The dispute arose from a challenge by the Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi, and another against a High Court order that granted grade p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Discriminatory Cut-off Date in Pension Revision for Pre-1996 Retired Judicial Officers. Government Resolution Denying Revised Pension to Pre-1996 Retirees Violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Raghavendra Anantrai Mehta, a retired District and Sessions Judge who retired on 30th September 1991, filed a writ petition under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Punjab State Electricity Board in Pay Parity Case for Sub Fire Officers. Sub Fire Officers Held Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Other Posts in Group XII Due to Inclusion in Same Group Without Justifiable Differentiation.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana which dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Punjab State Electric...