Search Results for "review dismissed"

5370 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5370 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Municipal Demolition Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review petition against dismissal of writ petition challenging demolition of alleged unauthorized construction rejected as review not an appeal.

The review petitioner, Bipin Chandulal Sodha, filed a review petition (Review Petition No. 31 of 2025) seeking review of the judgment dated 19 Decembe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioners seek re-argument on merits, not correction of error.

The review petition was filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) seeking review of an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Application for Lack of Error Apparent on Record. Court holds that review is not an appeal in disguise and that the judgment under review did not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record.

The applicants, who were the original respondents in the main petition, filed a review application under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Matrimonial Dispute Over Maintenance and Injunction. Court holds that review cannot be used to re-argue the merits of a case when the original order was passed with consent and no error apparent on record exists.

The case involves a review petition filed by John Vergese (the husband) against an order dated 5.11.2004 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Case to High Court for Fresh Hearing Due to Reliance on Wrong Pleadings. High Court's Dismissal of Writ Petition Set Aside as It Referred to Paragraphs from Another Case, Not the Appellant's Own Pleadings.

The appellant, Krishna Nand Shukla, claimed to have been appointed on an ad hoc basis as Lecturer in Military Science at Jawaharlal Nehru Smarak Post ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Condoned Delay in Filing Review Application and Dismissed Review as Not Maintainable Against Order Directing Reinstatement of Employee Whose Caste Claim Was Invalidated. The Court Held That Review Lies Only for Error Apparent on Record, Not for Reappreciation of Evidence.

The judgment pertains to Civil Application No. 1168 of 2015 filed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gondia and the Medical Officer, Prim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Review Petition in SC/ST Land Grant Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition against order in Writ Petition No.7988/2002 dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record or grounds for review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The case arises from a review petition filed against the order dated 17.06.2013 in Writ Petition No.7988/2002. The original writ petition involved a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record, not re-agitating merits.

The case pertains to a review petition filed by M/s National Textile Corporation Ltd. and another (the original respondents) seeking review of a judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on record, not re-hearing the appeal.

The judgment pertains to a review application filed by the appellants in First Appeal No. 620 of 1996, seeking review of the judgment and order dated ...