Search Results for "retirement gratuity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "retirement gratuity"

593 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 593 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment Order. Employer Cannot Withhold Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Without Termination of Service for Willful Omission or Negligence.

15 Feb 2011

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Deceased Employee's Legal Heirs in Delhi Transport Corporation Case — Resignation After 30 Years of Service Does Not Forfeit Pension Under Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. Employee's Long Service and Liberal Construction of Resignation Letter Entitle Him to Pension and Other Retiral Benefits Despite Resignation.

9 Dec 2025

The case involves an appeal by the legal heirs of Appellants, a deceased employee of Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), against the denial of pensiona...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Payment of Interest on Delayed Retiral Dues to Retired University Professor — Delay of Over Two Years in Pension, Gratuity, and Provident Fund Without Justification Attracts Interest at 10% Per Annum. Retiral benefits are a right earned by past service, and delay in payment without justification entitles the employee to interest.

8 Jun 2005

The petitioner, Anant Ramchandra Kulkarni, served as a Professor and first Head of the History Department at the University of Pune from 1969 until hi...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Retired Employee's Writ Petition Seeking Arrears and Terminal Benefits Based on Retrospective Wage Settlement. Court Holds That Subsequent Wage Settlement with Retrospective Effect Entitles Retired Employee to Differential Gratuity, Provident Fund, and Leave Salary with 6% Interest.

17 Feb 2025

The petitioner, K.Selvaraj, retired as a Special Grade Conductor from the respondent Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd. on 29.02...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Retired Conductor's Writ Petition for Post-Retirement Wage Settlement Benefits with 6% Interest. The court holds that a wage settlement made retrospectively applicable from a date prior to retirement entitles the retired employee to revised terminal benefits, even if the settlement was signed after retirement, and directs payment of differential amount with interest.

17 Feb 2025

The petitioner, K. Selvaraj, retired as a Special Grade Conductor from the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Karur Region, on ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition for Revision of Scale of Pay and Differential Terminal Benefits under Wage Settlement. Employee Entitled to Benefits under Retrospective Wage Settlement and Interest at 6% per Annum from Retirement until Payment.

17 Feb 2025

The writ petition was filed by a retired Special Grade Conductor of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Karur Region, seekin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IFCI's Appeal Against Retirees' Claim for Enhanced Pension Under VRS-2008. Voluntary Retirement Scheme's Full and Final Settlement Clause Bars Subsequent Claims for Pay Revision Benefits.

17 Sep 2019

The dispute pertains to thirty-one employees of IFCI who voluntarily retired under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme of 2008 (VRS-2008) on 1 February 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Release of Retirement Dues to Former President of Administrative Tribunal — Pension and Gratuity to Be Paid with 8% Interest. The court held that retirement benefits are not dependent on validity of appointment but on actual service rendered.

25 Feb 2016

The petitioner, an advocate since 1979, was appointed as President of the Goa Administrative Tribunal on 24.10.2001. His appointment was challenged in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Payment of Gratuity and Provident Fund to Retired Employee in Service Law Case — Employer's Denial Based on Pending Criminal Proceedings Without Departmental Inquiry Held Unjustified. Statutory Right to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Cannot Be Withheld Without Disciplinary Proceedings, and Provident Fund Being Employee's Own Contribution Cannot Be Withheld.

29 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Sayyed Shabbir s/o Sayyed Karim, a retired employee of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition under Art...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Calculation Dispute — Service Rules Cap on Maximum Gratuity Upheld Over Payment of Gratuity Act. Employer's restriction of gratuity to 8 years in second spell due to combined service exceeding 20-month cap under Rule 84 of Service Rules was valid and not violative of Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

10 Oct 2023

The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Co-Operative Adivashi Vikas Mahamandal Maryadit, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellat...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)