Search Results for "resident Indian company"

801 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 801 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

FERA APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2006

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Non-Impleadment of Company. Vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires specific averments and company must be made accused.

The petitioners, Harry Inder Dhaul, Narayan Singh Pathania, and Mikhail s/o Harry Dhaul, were directors of Siddhayu Ayurvedic Research Foundation Priv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction at Source on Guarantee Money Paid to Non-Resident Cricket Boards for Matches Played in India. Income from matches held in India is deemed to accrue in India under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, attracting TDS under Section 194E.

The case concerns an appeal by PILCOM (PAK-INDO-LANKA JOINT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE), a committee formed by the cricket boards of Pakistan, India, and Sr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Against Hubtown Ltd. Based on Bona Fide Dispute of Debt. Corporate Guarantee Enforcement Requires Prima Facie Case of Default and Absence of Substantial Dispute Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Hubtown...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Depreciation on Original Cost in Amalgamation Case Under Rule 10 of Income Tax Rules. Notional Depreciation to Non-Resident Parent Does Not Reduce Written Down Value for Successor Company.

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the assessment years 1976-77, 1977-78, and 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Foreign Company Failed to Comply with Registration Requirements Under Sections 592 and 599 of Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner, a foreign company with a place of business in India, cannot maintain a winding-up petition without registering under the Act.

The petitioner, Willis Europe B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with its principal place of business in the United Kingdo...