Search Results for "reopening beyond four years"

120 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reassessment Case on Limitation and Computation Grounds. Reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Valid as Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts, and Notice Served on Partnership Firm Was Proper Despite Section 282(2) Argument.

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, involving a partnership firm engaged in publishing newspapers and peri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reasonable Belief and Change of Opinion. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Nivi Trading Limited, a private limited company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2010-11 on 15th September 2010 declari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act — Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Invalid as Full Disclosure Was Made During Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Plus Paper Food Pac Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 18.11.2013 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Failure to Disclose — Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure

The petitioner, DIL Ltd., challenged a notice dated 8 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen the assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material Beyond Four Years. Reassessment Cannot Be Based Solely on Subsequent Year's Assessment Order Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The Petitioner, Sitara Diamond Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 20 June 2011 issued u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reimbursement of Expenses Disclosed in Return and Application Under Section 195(2) Sought, No Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Monitor India Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of a Dutch company, challenged a notice dated 22 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Reassessment Initiated Beyond Four Years Without Fresh Material or Failure to Disclose by Assessee is Invalid.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s German Remedies Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing pharmaceutical products,...