Search Results for "remission policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "remission policy"

120 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Convict Seeking Premature Release Under Remission Policy — MCOC Act Convict Not Entitled to Benefit of 2006 Policy as Subsequent 2010 Policy Excludes Organized Crime Offenders.

5 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Arun Gulab Gawli, a convict under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Act), filed a writ petition seeking prema...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Remission for Life Convicts in Murder Case Based on Beneficial Interpretation of Remission Policy. The court held that the petitioners, convicted for murder, should be placed in category 3(b) (22 years) rather than category 5(b) (26 years) of the 2010 remission guidelines as the motive of political rivalry was not established for all accused.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioners, Ankush Bharat Gaikwad and Yuvraj Bharat Gaikwad, were convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. They had undergone mor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Remission for Life Convicts in Murder Case: Petitioners Re-categorized from Category 5(b) to 3(b) Under 2010 Remission Policy. The court held that the motive of political rivalry was not established for all petitioners and the incident occurred without premeditation, thus they should be placed in Category 3(b) (22 years) rather than Category 5(b) (26 years) under the 2010 Remission Policy.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioners, Ankush Bharat Gaikwad and Yuvraj Bharat Gaikwad, were convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. They had undergone mor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of a Seven-Year-Old Girl in a Rarest of Rare Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery of Body at Instance of Accused, and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 376, 302, 201 IPC and Section 5/6 POCSO.

20 Apr 2023

The appellant, Pappu, was convicted for the rape and murder of a seven-year-old girl. On 13.05.2015, the victim was playing near her home when the app...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Writ Petition for Premature Release Consideration Under 2018 Policy Despite Subsequent Amendment. Court Holds That Policy Prevalent at Time of Conviction Governs Remission Consideration and Directs State to Re-examine Arbitrary Age Restriction in 2021 Policy.

31 Jan 2022

The petitioner, convicted for offences under Section 302/307/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment by judgment dated 30.9...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging 30-Year Imprisonment Order for Life Convict Under Remission Guidelines. Classification of convicts under 1992 and 2010 Guidelines for premature release held valid and not arbitrary.

28 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Amit s/o Gajanan Gandhi, a life convict undergoing imprisonment in Central Prison, Nagpur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Remission for Convict in Abetment of Suicide Case Under Government Resolution. The court held that the nature of the offence (Section 306 IPC) is not a valid ground to deny remission unless the convict falls under excepted categories in the Government Resolution.

24 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Vitthal Rayaji Gadekar, was convicted for offences under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code and was serving his sentence a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Held that Balance of Convenience Lies in Favour of Defendants and No Irreparable Loss Would Be Caused to Plaintiff. The plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC as the property was in the name of the partnership firm and not the plaintiff individually.

8 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Lt. Col. (Retd.) Shri Padmanabh Anantrao Panditrao, filed a suit in the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolhapur, seeking a declaration ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition for Premature Release in Murder Case — Co-accused's Release Not a Valid Ground for Parity. Petitioner's Sentence Period Including Remission Was Less Than 22 Years Required Under Clause 4(b) of Guidelines Dated 15th March, 2010.

9 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Chintaman Sitaram Kedari, a life convict convicted under Sections 452, 302 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a Criminal Wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demurrage and Wharfage Charges by Port Trust — Holds Customs Detention Not Attributable to Exporter for Demurrage Liability. The court quashed the demand for demurrage and wharfage charges against the exporter and directed the Customs authorities to pay the amount to the Port Trust.

29 Mar 2006

The petitioners, Vidyt Metallics Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition challenging the orders dated 17.12.1998 and 29.12.1998 and the demand dated 8...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)