Search Results for "recovery doubtful"

978 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 978 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Appellant in Murder and Robbery Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Recovery of Stolen Property and Weapon from Accused, Coupled with Conspiracy Evidence, Completed Chain of Circumstances.

The appellant, Sonu @ Sunil, along with four others, was tried for the murder of Bharosilal and robbery of gold and silver jewellery and two mobile ph...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence in Circumstantial Evidence Case. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Incriminating Articles Sufficient to Convict Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Ashish Burange, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, for the murder of Pushpa Pande, a 59-year-old spinster and r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery. Conviction under Sections 395, 397, 457 IPC Set Aside as Test Identification Parade Was Not Conducted and Evidence of Witnesses Was Inconsistent.

The case arises from a dacoity incident that occurred on the night of 20-21 March 1999 at a petrol pump in Dalimb village, Osmanabad. The owner Birajd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Substitution of Assignee in Pending DRT Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act. Assignment of debt under Section 5 of SARFAESI Act entitles assignee to continue pending recovery proceedings without fresh filing, and amendment of cause title is permissible.

The petitioner, Alpha and Omega Diagnostics India Ltd., challenged a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which upheld the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Motive, Last Seen Evidence, and Recovery of Articles.

The appellant, Pramil @ Premanand Rao, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder and r...