Search Results for "ransom demand"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court uphold conviction of appellant in Murder Case Under Sections 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 Due to complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence -- Conviction uphold as to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The Supreme Court heard a criminal appeal challenging the concurrent convictions by the Trial Court and High Court under Sections 302 and 201 of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case — Life Imprisonment Upheld. Evidence of Demand for Ransom and Recovery of Victim at Accused's Instance Establishes Offence Under Section 364(A) IPC.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by three appellants convicted under Sections 363 and 364(A) read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping, Murder, Extortion, and Destruction of Evidence. Conviction based on circumstantial evidence including CDRs, extra-judicial confession, and last seen evidence upheld.

The case involved two appeals before the Bombay High Court against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, convicting the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Purushotham and Manjunatha (appellants) against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom and Murder in Section 364A IPC Case — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Victim's Body. Appellants' Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Proved Chain of Circumstances Leading to Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping for ransom and subsequent murder of a 10-year-old boy, the son of a police constable. The appellants, Shashikant T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Ransom Demand Under Sections 363, 364A, 120B IPC — Appellant Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Abducting Minor Son of Factory Owner and Demanding Rs. 1 Lakh Ransom.

The appellant, Mohammad Murtuza Mohammed Mosin Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 363, 364A r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Identification. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 363, 365 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping of a nine-year-old boy, Deepak, son of Mohanlal Oswal (PW1), on 30th June 1994 at about 7:30 p.m. from near his ho...