Search Results for "railway accident claim"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "railway accident claim"

225 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation to Family of Deceased Passenger in Railway Accident Case. Death of a bonafide passenger due to being knocked down by a train while crossing tracks between stations constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the absence of a ticket on the body does not negate bonafide passenger status.

6 May 2026

The case involves an appeal filed by the original applicants (the family of the deceased) against the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, wh...

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation to Dependents of Railway Employee in Railway Accident Case, Reversing Tribunal's Denial Based on Contradictory Evidence. Accidental Fall from Moving Train Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989, and Railway Employee with Free Pass Qualifies as Bonafide Passenger Regardless of Pass Recovery at Site.

9 Mar 2026

The appeal concerned a compensation claim under the Railways Act, 1989 filed by dependents of a railway employee who died after falling from a train. ...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Accidental Fall from Train Due to Jerk. Deemed Bona Fide Passenger Entitled to ₹8,00,000 Compensation Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

20 Jan 2026

The present appeal was filed by the Union of India under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenging the award dated 20.08.2025 p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Employee's Compensation Case — Actual Monthly Wages Must Be Used for Computation. The Court held that the notification under Section 4(1B) does not cap wages; actual wages proved can be adopted, and the amendment deleting the deeming provision applies to pending proceedings.

13 Feb 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court enhancing compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Passenger Falling from Moving Train While Boarding - Untoward Incident Under Railways Act. The court held that an accident caused from a moving train while trying to board or deboard it is covered by the definition of 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the appellant's amputation injury is covered by the amended schedule, entitling him to compensation.

3 Jul 2017

The appellant, Shashikant Dhage, filed a claim under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, seeking compensation for grievous injuries sustained in a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Railway Accident Death Case. Claimants failed to establish wrongful act, neglect or default on part of railway administration to claim compensation over and above the statutory amount under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

27 Jan 2016

The appellants, parents of the deceased Siju S. Vallikalayil, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for the d...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Railway Claims Tribunal Award in Favour of Deceased Passenger's Dependents in Untoward Incident Case. Accidental Fall from Train Due to Jerk Constitutes an Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the Railway Administration is Liable for Compensation.

6 Aug 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against an award of the Railway Claims...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal, Upholds Compensation for Death Due to Fall from Train. Death of a bona fide passenger due to fall from train caused by rush and sudden jerk is an untoward incident under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway failed to prove self-inflicted injury.

1 Aug 2013

The appeal was filed by the Union of India through the General Manager, South Central Railway, challenging the Judgment and Award dated 13/7/2010 of t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway Appeal in Passenger Death Case — Untoward Incident Under Section 124A Railways Act, 1989 Established. Sudden Jerk While Alighting from Train Constitutes an Untoward Incident, and Railway's Denial of Ticket Validity Not Sustained.

18 Jul 2013

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against a judgment of the Recovery Cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Liability of Insurer Limited to Rs. 50,000 for Gratuitous Passenger in Luxury Bus. The court held that the insurer's liability for a gratuitous passenger in a luxury bus is limited to Rs. 50,000 under Section 95(2)(b)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, as the policy did not cover such passengers.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a motor accident claim arising from the death of a passenger traveling in a luxury bus. The claimant, Khudbuddin Inamdar, filed a cl...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)