Search Results for "promotion dispute"

1067 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1067 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Doctor Denied Promotion in Indian Railway Medical Service Due to Inadequate Grading. Selection Committee's Assessment of Annual Confidential Reports Held to Be Objective and Not Vitiated by Bias or Arbitrariness.

The appellant, Dr. Indira Saranath, was a doctor in the Indian Railway Medical Service (IRMS). She sought promotion to the post of Chief Medical Direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Promotion and transfer of employee challenged in Industrial Court. The Industrial Court shall decide the Complaint uninfluenced by the same.

The Indian Express (P) Ltd. promoted Rane from Senior Printer to Supervisor and transferred him to the Walunj Printing Press in Aurangabad, citing e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Promotion Case Under Bhakra Beas Management Board Regulations. Promotion Annulled by High Court Reversed as Appreciation Certificate Not Mandatory Under Seniority-cum-Merit Principle in Regulations 4(5) and 5.

The dispute arose from the promotion of appellants to the post of Leading Fireman under the Bhakra Beas Management Board Regulations, 1994. The appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in ACP Scheme Dispute — Deployment as Radio Telephone Operators Held Not a Promotion. Reorganisation of Posts Without Selection Process Does Not Disentitle Employees to Assured Career Progression Benefits Under Office Memorandum Dated 9.8.1999.

The appellants, Telephone Operators with the Delhi Fire Service (DFS), were deployed as Radio Telephone Operators (RTOs) in a higher pay scale followi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Seniority in CGHS Promotion Dispute. Seniority Determined by Date of Regular Appointment, Not Ad Hoc Promotion, Under Central Civil Services Rules.

The petitioner, Arjun Sopan Gaikwad, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 16 October 1978 and promoted to Upper Division Clerk on 9 April 1984. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion of Juniors in MHADA — Petitioner Not Confirmed in Service, Hence Ineligible for Promotion Under Circulars. Service Law - Promotion - Confirmation - Petitioner not confirmed despite re-designation, juniors confirmed earlier, no discrimination.

The petitioner, Mukund Shrivastava, a graduate engineer, joined the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) as a Junior Engineer on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Probationary Police Sub-Inspectors Challenging Termination. Termination simpliciter of probationers for unsatisfactory performance without stigma does not require inquiry or hearing.

The petitioners, 20 individuals, were appointed as Police Sub-Inspectors on probation in the Maharashtra Police Force. During their probation period, ...