Search Results for "procedural delay"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "procedural delay"

1977 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1977 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Applications in Land Acquisition Appeals Due to Unexplained Delay of Over 5 Years. The court held that the State cannot claim benefit of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 without sufficient cause, and the delay of 5 years and 5 months was not satisfactorily explained.

4 Jan 2018

The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector and Executive Engineer, filed multiple Civil Applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963,...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Application to Condoned Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. The court held that mere administrative delay without explanation for each day does not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

9 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat, through the Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, filed a Civil Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Application to Condoned 2386-Day Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal. Government's Internal File Movement Not Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

9 Mar 2026

The Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer, Godhra, and others (the State) filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Procedural Order on Discovery — Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Permit Challenge to Procedural Orders, Only Final Awards.

18 Nov 2010

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Tata Industries Limited and another against Gras...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Central Excise Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sanction. Prosecution for Alleged Removal of Scrap Resistors Without Payment of Duty Fails as Complaint Filed After 4 Years and Sanction Under Section 9 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Not Obtained.

14 Dec 2005

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of Criminal Case No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Second Appeal Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Appeal Against Injunction Decree. The Court Analyzed Principles Governing Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as Laid Down in Esha Bhattacharjee v. Managing Committee.

2 Aug 2017

The case involved an application for condonation of delay filed by the Superintending Archaeologist, Archaeological Survey of India, in appealing a de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Debt Recovery Pre-deposit Dispute — Holds Pre-deposit Not Required at Condonation of Delay Stage. The court ruled that Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 does not mandate pre-deposit before considering an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 20 of the Act.

18 Mar 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Deluxe Cotton Corporation and others, challenged an order dated 14 July 2014 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Criminal Revision Against Process Issuance — Petitioner Pursued Wrong Remedy Under Section 227 CrPC. The court held that pursuing a wrong remedy constitutes sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, and the revision should be heard on merits.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Ankit Padhye, challenged an order dated 17.07.2025 passed by the Special Court for Differently-able Persons, Senior Citizens and Margi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Application as Time-Barred. Limitation for Filing Application Under Section 34(3) Runs from Receipt of Award; Suit Filed Within Extended 30-Day Period Without Showing Sufficient Cause for Delay Cannot be Entertained.

26 Nov 2019

This appeal arose from the dismissal of an arbitration suit filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Additional Documents in Civil Suit — Belated Filing to Fill Lacuna Not Permitted. Trial court's discretion to reject application for producing resolution and letter of authority during cross-examination upheld as no justifiable cause shown.

11 Jan 2016

The petitioners, M/s. BGC International Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Balaji Pothraj, were defendants in Special Civil Suit No. 22/2007/A filed by the respondents...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)