Search Results for "private employer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "private employer"

1277 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1277 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Workmen's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Against Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam — Reinstatement with 30% Back Wages Upheld for Directly Engaged Gardeners. Termination During Conciliation Proceedings Violated Section 6E of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

3 Mar 2025

The case involves appeals by workmen (Gardeners) and the employer (Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam) against a High Court judgment modifying Labour Court awards....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Override Statutory Acquisition Process. Industrial Development Constitutes Valid Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

15 Feb 2021

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dated 02.11.2018, which dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants (the Stat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Challenge to Fringe Benefit Tax Provisions. Petitions question constitutional validity of Chapter XII-H of Income Tax Act, 1961 as violative of Article 14 and beyond legislative competence.

6 Dec 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard three writ petitions filed by M/s T.T.K. Prestige Ltd. and another, M/s N. Rangarao & Sons, and Karnata...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses/Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Minimum Wages Notification – Not mentioned. Petitioners, including industry associations and companies, challenged notification dated 27.12.2016 issued by the Labour Department on grounds of unconstitutionality and violation of Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

29 Mar 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Probationer Teacher. Rule 16(2) of MEPS Rules Mandates Notice Before Concluding Voluntary Abandonment of Employment.

6 May 2016

The petitioner, Magasvargiya Shikshan Sanstha, a school management, challenged the judgment and order dated 24.9.2015 of the School Tribunal, Aurangab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

31 Mar 2012

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Against Subsistence Allowance Order in De Novo Enquiry. Employee dismissed after departmental enquiry is entitled to subsistence allowance during de novo proceedings before Labour Court under Model Standing Orders.

24 Jan 2011

The petitioner, Mumbai Cricket Association, challenged an order of the 12th Labour Court, Bombay, dated 15th October 2010, which directed the payment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

15 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Addresses Multiple Writ Petitions by Complainants Against Respondent Company. Labour Dispute Allegedly Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, After Labour Court Orders.

1 Jan 1970

...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)