Search Results for "points for determination"

32 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 32 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Remands Suit for Fresh Consideration Due to Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination by Lower Appellate Court Renders Judgment Unsustainable.

The appellant, Bhagwan Govind Nagre, filed a second appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 06.06.1994 passed by the learned District Judge, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree of Permanent Injunction. The Court held that the First Appellate Court's failure to frame points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC vitiated its judgment.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (plaintiffs) and the respondents (defendants) concerning a suit for permanent injunction. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Independent Reasoning Renders Appellate Judgment Unsustainable.

The appellant, Bhausaheb R. Sanap, was defendant No.5 in Regular Civil Suit No.81 of 2000 filed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 (Ratnabai and Satyabhamabai)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Lease Dispute Due to Improper Points for Determination and Violation of Evidence Act. Appellate Court's reliance on oral evidence despite requirement of written lease under Clause 4 of agreement dated 04/05/1977 held erroneous.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for possession and mesne profits concerning a property in Mapusa, Goa. The appellants (defendant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Restores Trial Court's Dismissal. Failure of Lower Appellate Court to Frame Points for Determination Under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC Renders Reversal Judgment Unsustainable.

The present second appeal arises from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents no.1 to 8) against the original defendants (appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Appellate Decree for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. The First Appellate Court's judgment reversed the Trial Court's decree without framing points for determination or discussing evidence, rendering it unsustainable.

The present Second Appeal was filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 04/07/2005 passed by the learned 2nd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Appellate Decree for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Independent Reasoning Renders Appellate Judgment Unsustainable.

The present second appeal arises from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the defendants (respondents). The plainti...