Protecting Consumer Clarity in Pharmaceutical Markets
13 Jun 2024The case involves a dispute over trademark infringement between the plaintiff's "ZITA-MET" and the defendant's "XIGAMET" in the pharmaceutical sector....
Search Results for "pharmaceutical"
275 result(s) found
Found 275 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Heinz India and GSK, Classifies Nycil Prickly Heat Powder as Medicated Talcum Powder Under Sales Tax Acts. Product Held Not to Be Medicine Despite Medicinal Properties Due to Specific Statutory Entries Including Medicated Talcum Powder Under Entry 127 of KGST Act and Toilet Powder Under Entry 1(iii) of TNGST Act.
4 May 2023The Supreme Court dealt with appeals concerning the classification of Nycil Prickly Heat Powder under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (KGST Act...
- 164
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.
2 Jul 2019The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...
- 288
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal Against Denial of Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Passing Off Dispute, Holding No Prima Facie Case or Balance of Convenience. Phonetic Similarity of 'CHYMTRAL FORTE' to 'CHYMORAL FORTE' Insufficient for Interim Relief Where Drugs are Schedule H Prescription Medicines and Public Interest Favors Affordable Pricing.
17 Nov 2017The dispute arose from Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited's claim that Wockhardt Limited and East African (India) Remedies Pvt. Ltd. were passing off the...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.
14 Sep 2016The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...
- 29
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.
14 Sep 2016The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case Involving Pharmaceutical Marks LOX and XYLOX. Court finds prima facie that Defendants' XYLOX marks are deceptively similar to Plaintiff's LOX family of marks, and that the defence of common origin or acquiescence is not made out.
16 Sep 2014The Plaintiff, Neon Laboratories Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Themis Medicare Ltd. (Defendant No. 1) and Ciro...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction Against Defendant for Trademark Infringement and Passing Off of Identical Mark SPASGAN in Pharmaceutical Preparations. Plaintiff's Registered Trademark SPASGAN Entitled to Protection Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.
28 Jan 2014The Plaintiff, Wockhardt Limited, filed a suit against Eden Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. seeking to prevent infringement and passing off of its trademark SPAS...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cadila Pharmaceuticals in Passing Off Action by Medley Laboratories. Marks 'HB TONE' and 'RB TONE' Held Deceptively Similar for Pharmaceutical Products, Injunction Confirmed.
8 Apr 2011The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellant (original defendant) for infringement and passing o...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Clubbing of Establishments Under EPF Act. Common Ownership and Same Telephone Number Justify Clubbing for Coverage Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
4 Jan 2010The petitioner, M/s. Kiran Agencies, a proprietary firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged the order dated 30.03.2005 passed by the Em...
- 47
