Madras High Court Reserved Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Filed Under Article 226 Challenging Dismissal Orders. Petitioners from Various Town Panchayats Sought Quashing of Termination Orders and Reinstatement with Backwages.
23 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "panchayat reservation"
181 result(s) found
Found 181 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice Issued Without Prior Resolution of No-Confidence Motion by Gram Panchayat is Illegal and Arbitrary.
21 Jan 2025The petitioner, Chethana A Channabasappa, the President of Hosahalli Gram Panchayat, challenged a notice dated 06.01.2025 issued by the Assistant Comm...
- 11
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Election Notification for Gram Panchayats Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Rotation Policy. Failure to Follow Section 161 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 and Rule 3 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1997 Rendered the Impugned List Invalid.
3 Jul 2023The petitioners, Durgappa and Sharanamma, were Presidents of Bappur Gram Panchayat and Tidigol Gram Panchayat respectively. They filed a writ petition...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Land Reserved for Garden Since 1976 — Award Under Section 23 of RFCTLARR Act 2013 Quashed as Acquisition Not Completed Within Statutory Period
23 Mar 2022The petitioners, owners of land in Kankavali, challenged the reservation of their land for a garden under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning A...
- 19
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Postponement of Local Body Elections Due to COVID-19. Court Upholds State Election Commission's Discretion to Postpone Elections Under Article 243U of Constitution and Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, Finding No Arbitrariness in Decision.
13 Nov 2020The petitioners, five individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging the decision ...
- 189
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Public Trust Land. Held that the Municipal Corporation's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 was valid as the construction was on public property and no prior notice was required for demolition of unauthorized structures on public land.
20 Mar 2019The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of structures by the Municipal Corporation of Great...
- 80
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals Challenging Disqualification of Municipal Council Members for Defection. The court upheld the Speaker's order under Section 16 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, finding that the members had voluntarily given up party membership by contesting as independents.
30 Mar 2017The case involves two writ appeals filed against the order of a learned Single Judge who upheld the disqualification of certain members of the Town Mu...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process for Gram Panchayat. Court holds that election process once commenced cannot be interfered with under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the remedy lies in election petition under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.
28 Mar 2016The petitioners, Sajid Majid Khan and Babarao Parashram Kandhare (in W.P. No. 3196/2016) and Shaikh Salim Shaikh Madar (in W.P. No. 3420/2016), filed ...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inclusion of Families in Village Panchayat Ward Formation. Inclusion of 18 families from Village Revadi into Village Tambi for ward formation upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 4(2) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243(g) of Constitution.
1 Sep 2010The petitioners, Jadhav Shankar Dyandeo and Sapkal Sampat Bhau, were project-affected persons rehabilitated in Village Revadi. They sought formation o...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Development of Surrendered Land After Reservation Lapses — Revocation of Permission by Municipal Council Held Illegal. The court held that once a reservation lapses, the land reverts to the owner and any subsequent surrender is voluntary, and the Municipal Council cannot revoke permission granted on such surrender.
6 Jul 2006The petitioners, owners of Field Survey Nos. 96/3 and 98/2 in Khamgaon, sought to develop open spaces after surrendering land for a 60 ft. wide D.P. R...
- 68
