Search Results for "outraging modesty"

91 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Outraging Modesty Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Credible Evidence. Complaint filed after 8 months without explanation for delay and with contradictory statements leads to quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

The petitioner, Dr. Prakash Kanhayalal Kankaria, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking qua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 354 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Akhtar s/o Abaskhan Pathan, was charged with offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Defamation Case Ruling: Allegations of Outraging Modesty and IT Act Violation Confirmed, Criminal Intimidation Charges Dismissed. Court validates charges under IPC Section 509 and IT Act Section 67 for derogatory email content; dismisses criminal intimidation claims.

The case revolves around derogatory emails sent by the petitioner, containing gender-based remarks aimed at insulting the respondent. The court found ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unreliable Child Witness and Lack of Identification. Conviction under Sections 9 and 10 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Section 354-A IPC set aside as child witness admitted tutoring by grandmother and failed to identify accused.

The appellant, Subhash Balkrushna Buradkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, in Sessions Case No. 2 of 2013 for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Outraging Modesty and House Trespass in Toothpaste Incident. Accused's Entry into Complainant's House with Intent to Commit Offence Under Section 354 IPC Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Datta Jagannath Manera, was convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 354 and 451 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in POCSO Case, Upholds Conviction for Outraging Modesty of Minor. Court Relies on Testimony of 5-Year-Old Victim and Mother, Finds No Ground to Interfere with Trial Court's Judgment Under Section 354 IPC and Section 10 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Kalim Attarli Shaikh, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 10 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Obstruction and Outraging Modesty Case — Complainant Not a Public Servant Under Section 21 IPC for Section 186 IPC. Conviction under Sections 341, 186, 509 IPC set aside as essential ingredients not proved.

The case arises from a criminal revision filed by two accused, Gajanan and Ramchandra Satpute, challenging their conviction by the Judicial Magistrate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Remands Disproportionate Punishment Case to Industrial Court for Fresh Determination of Quantum. Industrial Court's Power to Interfere with Punishment Under MRTU & PULP Act Upheld, but Remand Ordered for Proper Application of Proportionality Principle.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, which had set aside the punishment of perman...