Search Results for "order 9 rule 13"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Held That Trial Court's Discretionary Order Did Not Suffer from Jurisdictional Error or Perversity.

The petitioners, who were defendants in a suit for permanent injunction filed by the respondent-company, challenged the order of the trial court dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Setting Aside Ex Parte Decree in Money Suit — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance.

The petitioner, Siddappa Savadi, filed a suit (O.S.No.175/1995) for recovery of money against the respondents. The suit was decreed ex parte on 17.08....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Money Suit — Service of Summons Valid Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. The court held that the defendant had knowledge of the suit and failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance, upholding the ex parte decree.

The appellant, M/s. CliniRX Research Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant in a money suit filed by the respondent, Bicare Limited, for recovery of mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Will Cancellation Suit — Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC by Remanding Without Setting Aside Ex Parte Decree on Proper Grounds.

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed a suit for declaration that a registered Will-Deed dated 12th August 2011 executed by her late husband was vo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition, Sets Aside Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Restoration in Specific Performance Suit. Defendant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Despite Knowledge of Proceedings.

The petitioner, Hemant Ganeshprasad Jaiswal, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 6.2.2006 against the respondent, Mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit — Petitioner Not Properly Served, Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside. Service of Summons Found Insufficient Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, Suit Restored for Fresh Adjudication.

The petitioner, Vijay Mohan Jagtap, filed a writ petition challenging two orders passed by the trial court in Regular Civil Suit No. 368/2007. The fir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Substituted Service Upheld Under Order 5 Rule 20 CPC. Exparte Decree Restored as Tenant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance.

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute over a room in Mumbai. The original petitioner (landlord) filed a suit for possession against the original...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Delay of 13 Years Not Condoned as Applicants Failed to Show Sufficient Cause Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (applicants) against an order of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Khed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Specific Performance Suit — Appellants Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Despite Service of Summons.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of a contract filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the appellants/defendants. The trial cour...