Search Results for "occupancy right"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "occupancy right"

499 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 499 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

29 Jun 2026

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal in Hindu Succession Act Case — Daughter Entitled to Share in Joint Family Property. Daughter's claim for partition and separate possession of 1/2 share in suit properties decreed, setting aside trial court's dismissal.

14 Jul 2025

The Regular First Appeal was filed by the plaintiff, Smt. Mallawwa Laxman Yadahalli (since deceased, represented by her LR Smt. Parvati Gorawade), cha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Order in Favor of Wakf Board — Land Belonging to Wakf Cannot Be Claimed by Private Individuals Based on Revenue Entries Alone. Petitioners failed to establish title over wakf land, and the court held that mutation entries do not confer title, directing them to approach the Wakf Tribunal under Section 85 of the Wakf Act, 1995.

20 Dec 2023

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Concluded Contract. Document lacking vendor's signature and containing incomplete terms cannot be enforced under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

18 Dec 2023

The appellants (original defendants) challenged the trial court's decree for specific performance of an alleged agreement to sell dated 1st October 20...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Land Reforms Act Case — Tenancy Rights Not Established Due to Lack of Evidence of Cultivation. Land Tribunal's Order Based on Surrender Deemed Invalid as Surrender by Non-Tenant Has No Legal Effect Under Section 48-A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

17 Nov 2022

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants challenging the order of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Occupancy Class-II to Class-I Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Holds That Section 44 of the Code Does Not Bar Such Conversion for Lands Acquired Under Part VII of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

9 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Ananta Landmarks Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order/communicat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Order in Land Reforms Act Case — Upholds Grant of Occupancy Rights to Tenants Based on Consistent Evidence of Cultivation.

9 Jul 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Yusuff Ali Khan and others) challenging the order dated 30.11.2007 passed by the Land T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order Granting Occupancy Rights Beyond Application — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction by Granting Rights Over Lands Not Claimed in Form No.7 Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. The Court held that the Land Tribunal cannot grant occupancy rights over lands not mentioned in the tenant's application, and punja lands are not agricultural lands under the Act.

11 Mar 2019

The petitioners, who are the legal representatives of the original landowner Venktray Shenoy, challenged an order dated 27.12.2011 passed by the Land ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent.

16 Apr 2015

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 12.4.2005 passed by the First Additional ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Requirement. Alleged Caste-Based Insult in Private Setting Not Attracting Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

10 Dec 2014

The petitioners, 22 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 20...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)