Search Results for "obstruction application"

819 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 819 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Obstruction Application in Execution Proceedings — Emphasizes Mandatory Inquiry Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Third Party Claimants Entitled to Full Inquiry Before Executing Court When They Assert Possession and Interest in Decree Property.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Indubai D. Kothawale and others (the applicants) challenging an order dated 16 October 2023 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows BDA's Appeal in Execution Proceedings: Right, Title or Interest Must Be Adjudicated Under Order XXI Rule 101 CPC. The Court held that an obstructor claiming title need not prove possession to be heard in execution proceedings.

The case involves an appeal by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) against the dismissal of its applications under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC in exec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revision Against Consent Decree in Property Suit — Co-operative Society Cannot Challenge Compromise Without Impleading Chairman Alleged of Mala Fides. Consent decree under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC upheld as valid compromise binding on society.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Nira and Palm Product Producers Co-operative Society Ltd. and its Secretary, Director, and a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging Mumbai Port Trust's Summary Eviction Notices Under Bye-law No.9. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Bye-law No.9 Ultra Vires Public Premises Act and Violated Natural Justice.

In a batch of writ petitions, occupants of structures at Reay Road, Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged eviction notices issued by the Mumbai Port Trust on 06...