Search Results for "objector"

185 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 185 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimant's Scooty Hit from Behind by ST Bus; 50% Contributory Negligence Attributed to Claimant for Sudden Turn Without Indication.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 04.11.2001 when the claimant, Lalitkumar Tulsidas Daiya, was riding his Scooty bearing Registra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Corrected Multiplier and Consortium Award. Negligence Apportioned Between Rickshaw and Truck Drivers Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of Shaileshbhai Vinodrai Mevada, who died in a vehicular accident on 27....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross Objection Despite Dismissal of Main Appeal for Non-Removal of Office Objections. Cross Objection under Section 253(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is an independent proceeding and does not abate with dismissal of appeal.

The case involves a Cross Objection filed by Cipla Limited (the assessee) under Section 253(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in response to an Income T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses VIDC Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases, Enhances Compensation for Claimants. Court applies multiplier method based on potential yield and market value, rejecting belated objections to valuation.

The case involves multiple first appeals filed by Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) against the judgment of the Reference Court enhan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Appeal by AMTS Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Case Due to Claimant's Contributory Negligence. The court upheld the 80:20 apportionment of negligence but reduced the compensation from Rs. 5,74,480 to Rs. 4,59,584 with 8% interest.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 08.05.2006 when the claimant, Babarbhai Jethabhai Vankar, a professor aged 38, was riding an Ac...