Search Results for "notice period"

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Duty Drawback Interest Case, Upholding High Court's Award of Interest for Delayed Refund. Clarificatory Circulars Under Exim Policy Have Retrospective Effect, Making Contractor Eligible for Duty Drawback and Interest Under Sections 27A and 75A of Customs Act, 1962.

The dispute arose from the respondent's claim for duty drawback under the deemed export scheme for civil construction work in the Koyna Hydro Electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employee's Appeal in Employment Contract Dispute Over Overseas Deputation Clause. The Court held that a business visit does not constitute deputation under the contract as deputation requires a tripartite consensual agreement and written evidence, which was lacking.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in a second appeal, concerning a dispute over an employment contract clause rel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Wakf Property Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation Under Section 6 of Wakf Act, 1954. One-Year Limitation Period for Challenging Wakf Publication Cannot Be Extended by Notice Requirement Under Section 56.

The appellant, Syed Zainul Abedeen, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Wakf Act, 1954, seeking a declaration that the property Mandarja Madnumber 14 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Complainant's Failure to Prove Debt. High Court's Reversal Set Aside as Trial Court's Findings on Rebuttal of Presumption Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Rohitbhai Jivanlal Patel against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had reversed his acquitta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service Under Rule 23 of LIC Pension Rules, 1995, and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...