Search Results for "murder during robbery"

131 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 131 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Lack of Credible Conspiracy Proof. Conviction Under Sections 302/34 and 120B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Evidence Excluding All Hypotheses of Innocence.

The appeal arose from a murder case where a recently married woman, Kamla Rani, was shot and killed in 1993 while returning from her parental home on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for murder of Shantabai Potdar, relying on last seen evidence, recovery of weapons, and motive.

The case pertains to the murder of Shantabai Potdar, who was found dead in her residential quarter on 25.01.2008. The appellants, Ajit Ashokrao Garje ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Last Seen Together, Motive, and Pointing Out of Crime Scene Held Sufficient to Prove Conspiracy Under Section 120-B IPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Sharda Jain (A-1), Raj Kumar (A-2), and Rajender (A-5) challenging their conviction under Sections 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Triple Murder and Robbery Case — Circumstantial Evidence Found Insufficient to Sustain Conviction. Last Seen Circumstance and Recovery of Stolen Articles Fail to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of three persons, Premchand Jain, his wife Anandi Devi, and their unmarried daughter Preeti, and the robbery of cash a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Dacoity Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Testimony of Injured Witness Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 395, 396, 302, 397 IPC.

The appellant, Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Dewree, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.690 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 397 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's testimony was found to be unreliable and contradictory.

The appellant, Amit Mishra, was convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Session Trial No. 424 of 1993 for offences punishable under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. The court held that the chain of circumstances, including last seen together and recovery of blood-stained clothes, was sufficient to convict under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Salim Kudrat Telli @ Iqbal, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Kabita Dasgupta, wife of the complainant Maniklal Har...