Search Results for "misdirection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "misdirection"

75 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 75 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Revisional Authority's Order Granting Rebate to Merchant Exporter. Rebate Claim Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 Is Independent of Manufacturer's Bogus Cenvat Credit.

28 Jun 2011

The Union of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the revisional authority under Section 35EE of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint — Closure of Factory by Employer Held Not Prima Facie Illegal Despite Assurance to Employees. The Court held that the Industrial Court misapplied the tests for interim relief under Section 30(2) of the MRTU & PULP Act, as closure is a right of the employer and the assurance regarding a different unit did not make the closure illegal.

9 Aug 2018

The Petitioner, Viraj Engineering Company, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing engineering components, decided to close its factory on 9 March...

High Court

Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.

4 Jun 2015

The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Scope of Hearing at Admission Stage of Victim's Appeal Under Proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. — No Leave Required, Summary Dismissal Permissible After Hearing. The court held that the appeal by a victim against acquittal is a matter of right and the procedure under Section 384 Cr.P.C. applies, allowing summary dismissal after hearing.

1 Feb 2019

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of hearing at the admission stage of an appeal filed by a victim under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Appeal into Cross-Objection in Eviction Suit — No Limitation for Cross-Objection Under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC. The court held that a cross-objection can be filed at any time before the hearing of the appeal, even if the appeal itself is time-barred.

6 Sep 2019

The petitioners, as co-owners of the suit premises, filed an eviction suit (R.A.E. Suit No.366/543 of 2010) against the respondents (tenants) on two g...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Industrial Tribunal Order in Industrial Dispute Case — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction by Suo Motu Raising Preliminary Issue. Management's Application Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for Approval of Dismissal Was Pending; Tribunal Erred in Holding Domestic Enquiry Vitiated Without Adjudicating the Application.

9 Mar 2017

The petitioner, M/s Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. (KFIL), filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Agricultural Land Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act — Petitioner's Agriculturist Status Not Properly Examined by Tribunal. The Court held that the Tribunal misdirected itself by not considering whether the petitioner was an agriculturist on the date of purchase, which is a relevant factor under Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

26 Aug 2014

The petitioner, L. Apparao, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment dated 07.04.2014 pa...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Under Section 30 of Employees' Compensation Act, Holding Both Employer and Manager Jointly Liable for Death of Worker in Explosion at Explosive Godown. The court set aside the Commissioner's award exonerating the employer and directed joint and several liability.

6 May 2026

The case involves an appeal under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the legal heirs of deceased Maroti Misal against the J...

High Court

High Court Quashes Central Government's Refusal to Grant Permission for Ayurvedic College Admissions, Upholds Principles of Natural Justice. Refusal Order Based on Matters Not Stated in Show Cause Notice Was Arbitrary and Violative of Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970.

13 Jul 2012

The matter arose from a challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against an order dated 14.09.2011 passed by the Department of AYUSH, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Employee Theft Case — Full Back Wages Granted Due to Flawed Enquiry and Insufficient Evidence. Labour Court's finding that management failed to prove theft of Rs.10,000 by employee was based on proper appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

30 Mar 2005

The Bombay Hospital Trust (Petitioner) dismissed its employee, Miss Rita Minwani (First Respondent), a Receptionist cum Clerk, on charges of theft, fr...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)