Search Results for "minor coparcener"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Joint Family Property and Possession Within Limitation.

The appellant, Sri N. Umesha, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the concurrent judgments of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Benami Property Dispute Under Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Property Was Held for Benefit of Hindu Undivided Family Coparceners Under Section 4(3)(a), Making Suit Barred Under Section 4(1).

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by Laxmi Prasad, his wife, and two daughters against his two sons and subsequent purchasers, seeking de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit Involving Compromise Decree Validity. Dispute pertained to joint family properties and a compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with allegations of sham nature.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court dated 23.11.2011, which had dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit, Restores Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC by Reappreciating Evidence on Legal Necessity and Antecedent Debt.

The present appeal arises from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiff, Rengan Ambalam, seeking a 1/3rd share in joint family properties, par...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Succession Dispute Over Joint Family Property — Restrains Alienation of Agricultural Land Pending Suit. The court held that plaintiffs, as Class I heirs, had a prima facie case for partition and injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The case involves a family dispute over agricultural land and other properties left by the deceased B.M. Raghothama Rao. The plaintiffs, comprising hi...