Search Results for "master restructuring agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "master restructuring agreement"

30 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal, Upholds Liquidated Damages Clause in Employment Contract. Clause requiring employee to pay Rs. 2 lakhs for resigning before three years held valid under Section 27 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, and not opposed to public policy.

14 May 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Vijaya Bank and another against the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka which had quashed clause 11...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

18 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Freezing of Demat Accounts of Promoter for Non-Compliant Company Under SEBI Circulars — Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Freezing of all securities held by a promoter in a non-compliant company, including unrelated investments, without notice or hearing is arbitrary and illegal under Article 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution.

26 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed two writ petitions filed by Dr. Pradeep Mehta and his son Neil Pradeep Mehta challenging the freezing of their demat acc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Section 9 Order in Arbitration Dispute Over Appointment of Court Receiver. Court holds that appointment of a Court Receiver to take possession of secured assets without considering the balance of convenience and irreparable loss is not warranted under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

26 Sep 2023

The present appeal impugned an order dated 31st August 2023 passed by the Learned Single Judge in a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Asset Reconstruction Company's Petition Against DRT Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Assignment of Debt by IIFL Upheld. The court set aside the DRT and DRAT orders granting ad-interim relief restraining the petitioner from taking steps in respect of secured assets under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the tribunals failed to consider the validity of the assignment and the balance of convenience.

18 Jan 2023

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Ltd., an Asset Reconstruction Company, challenged the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 2 June 2022 granti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision on Impleadment in Admiralty Suit - Commercial Appellate Division's Order Setting Aside Addition of Gulf Petroleum FZC as Defendant Maintained. Maritime Claim for Mis-delivery of Cargo Under Section 4(1)(f) of Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 Alleged by Bank as Bill of Lading Holder.

23 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from an Admiralty Suit filed by Banque Cantonale de Geneve (Respondent Bank) against the owners of the vessel M.V. Polaris Galaxy (A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

20 Feb 2014

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.

30 Jul 2013

The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petitions for Non-Prosecution Due to Non-Compliance with Directions. Failure to File Affidavit of Documents and Appear Before Court Leads to Dismissal Under Rule 34 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two company petitions (CP 496/2014 and CP 497/2014) filed by Janak Herkishen Vaswani and Mrs. Renuka Herkishen Vaswani respectiv...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)